Scheduled pitstops in F1
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: 4 years ago
Scheduled pitstops in F1
Began in 1982 apart from Fangio I'm aware, but watching the late 70's and early 80's I think it's bizarre how they didn't begin earlier. Retirements and incidents are surprisingly dominated by tyre failures and wear is clearly slowing drivers hugely. I imagine that ground effect suddenly caused a lot more stress on tyres. Given that everything was advancing at pace (and that's the reason tyres were popping all over the place) I find it very surprising that nobody worked on tyre stops, even before refuelling was dreamt up.
I'm amused that at Silverstone 79 Murray is burbling away saying how impressive an unscheduled tyre stop was (it took somewhere between 30 seconds and half an hour, but Murray was very impressed) but James (on his first appearance with Murray) corrects him and says how much further advanced Indycar is at pit stops. Can't remember if it was the same race but in 79 Jabouille amusingly pulled his front wing off by running over the air line. Murray was still impressed
Thoughts?
As an aside, does anyone remember a Brabham pit crew on Blue Peter? I think it was the low slung car, so that would date it. I think they did the four wheels in 6 seconds - things were gradually improving! Shame they were crap at everything else
I'm amused that at Silverstone 79 Murray is burbling away saying how impressive an unscheduled tyre stop was (it took somewhere between 30 seconds and half an hour, but Murray was very impressed) but James (on his first appearance with Murray) corrects him and says how much further advanced Indycar is at pit stops. Can't remember if it was the same race but in 79 Jabouille amusingly pulled his front wing off by running over the air line. Murray was still impressed
Thoughts?
As an aside, does anyone remember a Brabham pit crew on Blue Peter? I think it was the low slung car, so that would date it. I think they did the four wheels in 6 seconds - things were gradually improving! Shame they were crap at everything else
The board equivalent of the Jody scheckter chicane. Fast but pointless
- Michael Ferner
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: 7 years ago
- Real Name: Michael Ferner
- Favourite Racing Car: Miller '122', McLaren M23
- Favourite Driver: Billy Winn, Bruce McLaren
- Car(s) Currently Owned: None
- Location: Bitburg, Germany
I've said it before, and I'll glady repeat it: changing wheels in nought-point-something belongs on the circus stage, not in F 1. One of the reasons I no longer watch.
2023 'Guess The Pole' Points & Accuracy Champion
If you don't vote now against fascism, you may never have that chance again...
If you don't vote now against fascism, you may never have that chance again...
Ceterum censeo interruptiones essent delendam.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 156
- Joined: 18 years ago
- Favourite Racing Car: Lotus 98T, Porsche 917
- Favourite Driver: Nigel Mansell
- Favourite Circuit: Brands Hatch
- Car(s) Currently Owned: Alfa 156 V6
- Location: Over the edge
Why does it belong on the circus stage, Michael?
"I decided i was going to go into it flat, so i did" Nigel Mansell, 1990 Mexican GP
- Michael Ferner
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: 7 years ago
- Real Name: Michael Ferner
- Favourite Racing Car: Miller '122', McLaren M23
- Favourite Driver: Billy Winn, Bruce McLaren
- Car(s) Currently Owned: None
- Location: Bitburg, Germany
Where else?
2023 'Guess The Pole' Points & Accuracy Champion
If you don't vote now against fascism, you may never have that chance again...
If you don't vote now against fascism, you may never have that chance again...
Ceterum censeo interruptiones essent delendam.
- erwin greven
- Staff
- Posts: 20118
- Joined: 19 years ago
- Real Name: Erwin Greven
- Favourite Motorsport: Endurance Racing
- Favourite Racing Car: Lancia Delta 038 S4 Group B
- Favourite Driver: Ronnie Peterson
- Favourite Circuit: Nuerburgring Nordschleife
- Car(s) Currently Owned: Citroën C2 1.4 (2006)
- Location: Stadskanaal, Groningen
- Contact:
Changing wheels in less than 2.0 seconds does belong in F1. It makes F1 an absolute phenomenal sport. It is a team sport. At some 275kmh a car drives 76m/s. Any 10th of a second makes a difference of 7,5 meters. Which is enough to pass a car.
Brian Redman: "Mr. Fangio, how do you come so fast?" "More throttle, less brakes...."
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: 4 years ago
Nobody interested in the question?
The board equivalent of the Jody scheckter chicane. Fast but pointless
- Everso Biggyballies
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 49663
- Joined: 18 years ago
- Real Name: Chris
- Favourite Motorsport: Anything that goes left and right.
- Favourite Racing Car: Too Many to mention
- Favourite Driver: Kimi,Niki,Jim(none called Michael)
- Favourite Circuit: Nordschleife, Spa, Mt Panorama.
- Car(s) Currently Owned: Audi SQ5 3.0L V6 TwinTurbo
- Location: Just moved 3 klms further away so now 11 klms from Albert Park, Melbourne.
Pitstops for tyres were very much part of racing in the fifties..... in fact Moss won in Argentina simply by having a lighter car, driving accordingly, and not stopping for tyres when all his opposition did. A brilliant bluff strategy where his opposition assumed he wouls also need to stop for tyres.
Dont forget back in those days , even the sixties and seventies pitstops for tyre changing were a long laborious job, with no multi person efforts... in those days it took a long time to even get the wheels off, having to hammer the spinners that locked the wheels. Even in the seventies a pit stop for tyres needed the best part of a minute stationary.
Here is an article about Moss in Argentina....
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... HbA9d.html
* I started life with nothing, and still have most of it left
“Good drivers have dead flies on the side windows!” (Walter Röhrl)
* I married Miss Right. Just didn't know her first name was Always
- PTRACER
- Forum Administrator
- Posts: 42179
- Joined: 20 years ago
- Real Name: Paul
- Favourite Motorsport: Formula 1
- Favourite Racing Car: Lotus 49
- Favourite Driver: Gilles Villeneuve, James Hunt
- Favourite Circuit: Nordschleife
- Car(s) Currently Owned: Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X JDM
- Contact:
If the question is "Why were there no scheduled pitstops before 1982?", it is relatively simple - they took too long to complete. 20 seconds stationary was a lot of time to lose then, as it is now. Add another 10-15 seconds slowing down for the pitlane and accelerating back out again. And then calculate another 1-2 seconds per lap lost for the next few laps for the tyres to get some heat in, since there were no tyre warmers. You would have to gain back those 40 seconds on track just to catch up with the guy ahead, who had decided to do the whole race on one set of tyres (since they were durable enough to make the distance back then). And that's just thinking about the 1970s, a pitstop in the 1950s and 1960s would have taken a lot longer.
Developer of the 1967v3 Historic Mod for Grand Prix Legends: viewtopic.php?t=17429
King of the Race Track, Destroyer of Tyres, Breaker of Lap Records
King of the Race Track, Destroyer of Tyres, Breaker of Lap Records
- Cheeveer
- Moderator
- Posts: 12563
- Joined: 18 years ago
- Real Name: Jacob
- Favourite Racing Car: Panoz GTR1
- Favourite Driver: Alex Zanardi
- Favourite Circuit: Bathurst
- Location: 24 hours from Le Mans
If the fastest way to complete a 300km race is to make a pitstop for tyres and whatnot in the middle, I'm all for it.
Just philosphically speaking.
Just philosphically speaking.
***Some say you should live each day like it was your last... but who wants to live each day in wild panic and extreme death anxiety?
The universe, look at the hugeness of it... it is a dizzying thought that little ol' me is the centre of it all!***
The universe, look at the hugeness of it... it is a dizzying thought that little ol' me is the centre of it all!***
- Everso Biggyballies
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 49663
- Joined: 18 years ago
- Real Name: Chris
- Favourite Motorsport: Anything that goes left and right.
- Favourite Racing Car: Too Many to mention
- Favourite Driver: Kimi,Niki,Jim(none called Michael)
- Favourite Circuit: Nordschleife, Spa, Mt Panorama.
- Car(s) Currently Owned: Audi SQ5 3.0L V6 TwinTurbo
- Location: Just moved 3 klms further away so now 11 klms from Albert Park, Melbourne.
As it happens re the time taken, I have just watched a replay of the 1982 Austrian GP on TV.... They (commentators) were very excited that Piquet and then Patrese stopped their Brabhams for fuel and tyres in just over 30 seconds each, with Murray talking of potentially sub 30 seconds stationary time to come in the future. Wonder if he ever thought tyre changes would be a 2 second stationary process!PTRACER wrote: ↑4 years ago
If the question is "Why were there no scheduled pitstops before 1982?", it is relatively simple - they took too long to complete. 20 seconds stationary was a lot of time to lose then, as it is now. Add another 10-15 seconds slowing down for the pitlane and accelerating back out again. And then calculate another 1-2 seconds per lap lost for the next few laps for the tyres to get some heat in, since there were no tyre warmers. You would have to gain back those 40 seconds on track just to catch up with the guy ahead, who had decided to do the whole race on one set of tyres (since they were durable enough to make the distance back then). And that's just thinking about the 1970s, a pitstop in the 1950s and 1960s would have taken a lot longer.
* I started life with nothing, and still have most of it left
“Good drivers have dead flies on the side windows!” (Walter Röhrl)
* I married Miss Right. Just didn't know her first name was Always
- Everso Biggyballies
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 49663
- Joined: 18 years ago
- Real Name: Chris
- Favourite Motorsport: Anything that goes left and right.
- Favourite Racing Car: Too Many to mention
- Favourite Driver: Kimi,Niki,Jim(none called Michael)
- Favourite Circuit: Nordschleife, Spa, Mt Panorama.
- Car(s) Currently Owned: Audi SQ5 3.0L V6 TwinTurbo
- Location: Just moved 3 klms further away so now 11 klms from Albert Park, Melbourne.
Interesting video outlining the evolution of pit stops over the years up to the current day. (A little bit about pit stops long before the days of F1.)
Amusingly tells of when (1950's) drivers would pit for tyres fuel and a glass of champagne or brandy to sharpen themselves up!
Amusingly tells of when (1950's) drivers would pit for tyres fuel and a glass of champagne or brandy to sharpen themselves up!
* I started life with nothing, and still have most of it left
“Good drivers have dead flies on the side windows!” (Walter Röhrl)
* I married Miss Right. Just didn't know her first name was Always
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: 4 years ago
Nobody remember Brabham on Blue Peter?
Sadly not on youtube
Sadly not on youtube
The board equivalent of the Jody scheckter chicane. Fast but pointless
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: 4 years ago
Watching a pitstop at say Kyalami from the 80s looks absolutely terrifying now. They didn't used to bother with this slowing down bitPTRACER wrote: ↑4 years agoIf the question is "Why were there no scheduled pitstops before 1982?", it is relatively simple - they took too long to complete. 20 seconds stationary was a lot of time to lose then, as it is now. Add another 10-15 seconds slowing down for the pitlane and accelerating back out again. And then calculate another 1-2 seconds per lap lost for the next few laps for the tyres to get some heat in, since there were no tyre warmers. You would have to gain back those 40 seconds on track just to catch up with the guy ahead, who had decided to do the whole race on one set of tyres (since they were durable enough to make the distance back then). And that's just thinking about the 1970s, a pitstop in the 1950s and 1960s would have taken a lot longer.
The capabilities to improve the stationary time was already there (see indycar) so i'm just surprised it wasn't worked on earlier.
Without pitlane limiters the overall stop could have been similar to today
The board equivalent of the Jody scheckter chicane. Fast but pointless
- Smuto
- New Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 3 years ago
- Favourite Motorsport: Formula 1
- Favourite Racing Car: Lotus 79
- Favourite Driver: Ronnie Peterson
- Favourite Circuit: Osterreichring
- Location: Spain
There were scheduled pitstops before 1982, but they didn't realize the strategic advantage until that year. I watched a lot of late 70s races where the Ferraris had to stop mid-race because the Michelin tyres didn't last the whole race. And particularly I remember one time during the 1978 Spanish GP where they even performed a double pit-stop. So, while they did exist, it was considered a con, and no one bothered to improve the speed of the pitstops until Brabham.
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: 4 years ago
That's why I find it so surprising stops weren't worked on earlier. Ground effect was mashing the tyres; not just the michelins either. 1979 is tyre carnage.Smuto wrote: ↑3 years ago There were scheduled pitstops before 1982, but they didn't realize the strategic advantage until that year. I watched a lot of late 70s races where the Ferraris had to stop mid-race because the Michelin tyres didn't last the whole race. And particularly I remember one time during the 1978 Spanish GP where they even performed a double pit-stop. So, while they did exist, it was considered a con, and no one bothered to improve the speed of the pitstops until Brabham.
The board equivalent of the Jody scheckter chicane. Fast but pointless